ontologymythos
the myth of the abyss, the
fondatezza, aldilà:la the history of the myth is the history of the
places of the myth, the history mitika of the myth is the history of
the Being mitiko, or the eternal return of the myth or the infinite
resonance of the being in the myth, in the latenza, guarded, cured for
eventuarsi in the epokè mythical. The history of the myth is the
history of the glade of the Being, of the diradato Being, clears, free
of Being in the abyss mitiko, without null, nothing, aim, sunset,
eclisse. Nobody still has been free to search the history of the
ontologia of the myth, afterlife of the theological ermeneutica, beyond
the categorical, epistemica, paradigmatica metaphysics nichilista. Not
there is neither the ontologia of the mythical being, neither ontosofia
of the myth or the history mitika of the myth. The history of the myth
I found myself on the mythical history of the libertà:senza it are
free to contemplate the myth, not is myth but single theological
fondamentalismo, teocrazia:la history mitika of the myth is the history
mitika of the freedom of Being in presence of the contemplation of the
Being divinity. The myth is when the being places itself dinanzi in the
contemplation of the Being that gives itself, throws itself to the
presence in the glade, in the topology of the Being, which ontologia of
the poetante Being, the Gegengrundsein that eventua in the ontovarietà
of the gettatezza of the myth is the poetante glade that it guards,
kriptata, latent the cure of the Being. The places of the
Gegengrundsein are the kaosmici spaces where are thrown dinanzi, It are
mitiko the places of the myth are those that are are found to us of
forehead not to a horizon of the world, or to one perspective mondana,
or a sunset or eclisse cosmic, but the Being is inhabited poeticamente
from the horizon and the perspective of the Being without aim, decline,
sunset, without eclisse, which eternal return of the resonance of the
Being mitiko. Only therefore eventua the epochè of the history mitika,
not teokratica, of the myth. A lot for being rigorous until in fondo:il
myth are not the topology of the teocrazia, neither the myth are the
cosmic nichilista singolarità of the imaginary time, giacchè those
evocative topologies are always categories of the perspective of the
tramontante world while the horizon of the Being mitiko is not never
found of forehead to the eclisse, to the sunset, to the end of the
history, the time, the space, the kosmo. In the myth instead there is
the eternal return of the ontologica difference between the Gegenseyn
and the Widerseyn: not null or the nothing, but the Being that us comes
encounter, the Being that is thrown to the presence, in order to
inhabit the Being that contemplates the glade. The history mitika of
the myth is the history of the difference that eventua in the poetante
ontologia, which presence that inhabits the kaosmico place. The history
mitika of the myth is the history of the Being that contemplates the
being of forehead, which presence of the glade, never has where not
inhabited neither the entity, neither Is to us, neither the mondità,
neither the metaphysics, neither the teocrazia, but only the resonance
of the Being that us encounter comes, which eternal return. Pag. 06 the
history mitika of the myth of the Physis is the history from the
origins to the templari, a lot in order to inhabit the historical
places of the myth, eventua in the resonance which To be itself mitiko
divine Being that us comes encounter, Being that inhabits the Being,
Being that meets itself kriptato in the Being mitiko of the Physis. The
topology, the place where the Being us comes encounter and it lives to
us is “mithos”: the topology of the myth is mitika the topology of the
history of “mithos” only in the topology of “mithos” the history
eventua which history mitika of “mithos”: giacchè lì it is only the
free of being history mitika of “mithos” and never more history of the
teocrazia, metaphysical history of the teocratica theology,
metaphysical history of the teocratica theology, history of the will of
power of the teocrazia, history of teocratica ethics. The places where
“mithos” us come encounter, or where the being meets the being that
eventua and inhabits the essence of the poetante thought, they are the
places of “mithos” sacred, dark, the misterici ones, kriptati, because
that proximity of the being with its ikona that it is thrown to the
presence and inhabits it is mythical in the sense of inexpressibile,
inaudita, and from the cosmic physical paradigms, the history mitika of
the myth it is the history of the free spaces, inhabits solo to you the
Being that us comes encounter, which Gegenseyn, never invalidity, and
in contempo:Essere that it is met in the being that is thrown and
lived, in the contemplation, The varieties of coming encounter of the
Being are infinite, inexpressibile, without eclipse: because the places
of “mithos” escape to the classification of the categorical imperative
of the rigor ration them or of the nichilista ideal metaphysics,
sinergetica, supersymmetrical, inferenziale, logistic, teocratica. The
events of “mithos” are always in relativity with the events and the
ontovarietà of the Being that us comes encounter, than eventua which
ontologica freedom: the Being meets itself, contemplates the freedom of
being kaosmica. The places of “mithos” are the topologici spaces where
the Being are arranged in the contemplation, listen, the vision, the
sensibility and the poetante thought of the Being of forehead,
dinnanzi, that encounter comes us, in the kaosmica Gegenseyn. The
history mitika of “mithos” is the history of the glades, the empty
ontologici of the Physiseyn, where the being eventua for being
contemplated and in order to inhabit the forehead being poeticamente,
beyond that to inhabit only the world, the “Physis poeticamente”, the
kosmo. When a place, a glade, an empty one is inhabited poeticamente
the Being that throws itself and that encounter to the Being comes,
eventua “mithos” and the its history which mythical history of the
mitiko to inhabit the poetante Being poeticamente, in freedom, truth,
proximity with the ontosofico Being. The freedom of search on the
mythical history of “mithos” of the Physis eventua in the history of
the ordinary places of the sense of “mithos”, of its essence, its
presence here and afterlife of the world the places of “mithos”, indeed
better the topology of “mithos”, the empty space, the glade, the free
space from the mondità where is guarded, cured, evoked and
contemplated the Gegenseyn: the Being that comes encounter in order to
live poeticamente, not only the world, but the ikona of the Being, the
essence of the Being, the poetante Being, the ontologico Being, the
ontosofico Being. Eventua therefore in the space and the time of the
world the ontologica difference: the topology of the Being is
introduced mitiko, the fluctuating topology of the world of Is to us
here and here, of the virtual world, the imaginary world, the
ontologico world, the poetante world. The world of the Being mitiko
throws itself in the mondità also which world mitiko, chaotic world
cosmic world, caosmico world, onirico world, estatico world and its
metaphysical infuence unfolds itself in the ethical world, epistemico,
paradigmatico, ermeneutico, constituent, noetico. Which foundation of
the truth of Is mitiko its infuence gives sense to the kaos, to the
invisibile, the inexpressibile one, the inaudito one, the present
absence of its providential sacralità: the only one that can save to
us or cure in the world of the afterlife, the good and the evil.
the Topology of ssere mitiko and its animated topology of the
animated Being that it extends It are to us, but is not the ontologico
or poetante Being. That ontovarietà unfolds the complexity of the
fondatezza of the Being mitiko in virtual, animated, ontologico,
imaginary, onirico, metaphysical, sinergetico, supersymmetrical the
world and disvelano how much will of power is in the history mitika of
“mithos” of the Physis. Will of power of the eternal return of the
Being “mithos”, in the epochè of the history of Are to us, but also
will of categorical imperative hegemonic infuence in the metaphysics,
ermeneutica, poetica, aesthetic, epistemè, virtual, imaginary,
onirica, estatica, mythical, magical ethics. In the Being “mithos”, the
animated Being does not adapt itself, in truth neither to Is to us,
neither to the ontologico or poetante Being. In the world of “mithos”
the animated world it does not find again the metaphysical adequacy,
epistemica, rations them, poetica, aesthetic, ethics with the world of
It are to us, neither with the Being in cosmic, imaginary, virtual,
kaosmico the world. But that ontologica difference of the adequacy does
not neglect the influential ortogonalità of the will of metaphysical
power of the history mitika of “mithos”, indeed its categorical
imperative gives sense, identity, teocrazia historical and
transcendental. The Being “mithos”, which to be animated …..
